Three strikes and you're out: on democrats and religion (strike 3)
Strike #3: the
"if you can't beat them, join them approach." This position is better than strike 1 insofar as it recognizes that a politician in the United States today must draw an explicit link between religion (or at least value talk) and politics. It's also better than strike 2 in that it tries to give substantive content to a position, rather than merely giving examples of one's own religiosity (I was an altar boy, I go to church, I pray, etc). Strike 3's fatal flaw, however, comes from the fact that when adopted you've given up on your own moral and political convictions - the Democrat becomes a Republican.
2 Comments:
democrats are screwed(perhaps i should go republican...) :)
Okay, once again I don't know ANYTHING about politics, except "car" conservative republicans, sad I know- but maybe unpolluted?
anyways, why can't democats say: yes, I am religous and good etc with morals and values, but point out how open minded they are to other religions? they are liberal right? isn't that a check in the open-minded box? maybe they are already doing that. i dont know really.
Maybe I am over simplifying, but if democrats take the same approach as republicans it may seem whimpy now but overtime won't it become a non-issue since both parties share the same view? that way voters can actually vote based on political things?
politics are something americans participate in because they are bored, and have already reached the top level of their new X- box/ PS 2 thing. . . =/
dont mean to offend anyone,
Karen P
Post a Comment
<< Home